Go for Guehi? Tuchel’s centre-back dilemma after Croatia concerns

England’s World Cup campaign ignited in style against Croatia, but the defensive frailties exposed in Dallas demand urgent attention. A second-half surge—built on rapid transitions and clinical finishing—masked deeper issues at the heart of Gareth Southgate’s side, where two centre-backs struggled to impose themselves against a disciplined opponent. With Ghana next in Group L, Thomas Tuchel faces a clear choice: stick with the erratic pairing of John Stones and Ezri Konsa or gamble on Marc Guehi’s composure under pressure.

When the attack shines but the defence stumbles

England’s forwards produced a scintillating display in the second half, but the opening 45 minutes laid bare the risks of pairing Stones and Konsa at the back. The duo’s missteps in build-up play—Konsa’s misjudged chipped pass and Stones’ poor first touch—were directly linked to both of Croatia’s goals. Stones’ failure to recover from a loose clearance and Konsa’s inability to read a through ball underlined a lack of steel in duels and aerial battles. By full-time, the numbers reflected their struggles: Stones made just one unsuccessful tackle in 87 minutes, while Konsa completed none of his five aerial duels and won only three of eight ground duels.

The midfield, tasked with shielding the defence, was overwhelmed early. Declan Rice and Elliot Anderson, despite their industry, could not compensate for the centre-backs’ hesitancy when pressed. Croatia’s high press forced errors, and England’s attempts to play out from the back lacked the confidence of a team with a settled defensive spine. Jamie Carragher’s blunt assessment—”We probably lack something defensively to go all the way”—was a rare moment of candour after the final whistle.

Guehi’s Premier League form under the microscope

Marc Guehi, benched for the opener, now stands as Tuchel’s most plausible alternative. The Crystal Palace defender’s Premier League record this season suggests he could offer the aggression and physicality that Stones and Konsa lacked. While the article stops short of detailing Guehi’s exact statistics, it implies his ball-winning ability surpasses that of the starting pair. His absence against Croatia was conspicuous; had he been on the pitch, the defensive errors leading to goals might have been avoided.

The question now is whether Tuchel trusts the data over the status quo. Guehi’s inclusion would signal a tactical pivot, prioritising defensive solidity over the experience of Stones, a World Cup winner. But the stakes are high: a loss to Ghana could end England’s tournament before the knockout rounds, making the decision as much about psychology as tactics.

The tactical fix: pressing, protection, and personnel

England’s second-half revival against Croatia owed much to their willingness to commit men forward, but the same aggression left them exposed when out of possession. The centre-backs’ inability to play through pressure highlighted a structural flaw: a lack of a true ball-playing defender who can turn defence into attack cleanly. Stones, for all his technical quality, was culpable in possession losses that led to Croatia’s goals.

Tuchel’s options are limited. If he retains Stones and Konsa, he must demand more from Rice and Anderson in defensive transitions, or risk another sluggish start. Alternatively, Guehi’s introduction could shore up the backline, allowing the full-backs to push higher. The trade-off? A less composed build-up, but greater security against counter-attacks—a gamble Tuchel may now consider worth taking.

Ghana present a different challenge: a side capable of exploiting pace and directness. If England’s centre-backs are again found wanting, the tournament could end in Dallas. Tuchel’s dilemma is not just tactical; it’s existential. The attack has proved its worth. The defence must now do the same.