Vuskovic’s £50m Brighton move: Why Spurs sold despite his World Cup heroics

Tottenham’s £50m sale of Luka Vuskovic to Brighton is less a statement of intent than a concession to defensive chaos. The Croatia under-21 international, who never made a competitive appearance for Spurs, departs as the club’s fourth-biggest sale after Kane, Bale and Walker—a figure that underlines how little his future mattered in north London. Brighton, meanwhile, have broken their transfer record to secure a defender whose World Cup breakthrough in Qatar never translated into Spurs’ first team.

Spurs’ defensive carousel leaves no room for sentiment

Vuskovic’s exit was driven by Spurs’ inability to guarantee him minutes. The club added Marcos Senesi and Jan Paul van Hecke last summer, joining Cristian Romero, Kevin Danso and Micky van de Ven in a defensive squad that already exceeded the teenager’s development needs. Brighton’s £46m upfront fee, rising to £50m with add-ons, was enough to prise him away—along with a 20% sell-on clause and matching rights that could allow Spurs to revisit the deal if Vuskovic’s career stalls. His departure, while financially tidy, exposes Spurs’ broader struggle to balance ambition with pragmatism. Tottenham’s record-breaking double in one window—Tonali and Fernandes—masked deeper structural issues, and Vuskovic’s sale is another symptom of a squad overhauled without clear cohesion.

Brighton bet big on a Croatia prospect with unfinished business

For Brighton, Vuskovic represents a calculated gamble on potential. The 19-year-old’s World Cup performances—where he starred for Croatia’s youth teams—caught the eye, but his Hamburg loan last season yielded no competitive football. Roberto De Zerbi’s side, already reshaping their backline, clearly see value in a left-footed defender with Champions League football ahead. The £50m fee is a statement of intent, but Brighton’s history of smart recruitment suggests they believe Vuskovic can fill a specific role rather than solve all their defensive questions. Whether he can displace existing options like Adam Webster or Joel Veltman remains to be seen.

Conte’s waning influence and the Spence factor

Vuskovic’s sale also reflects Antonio Conte’s diminished leverage. The manager’s relationship with the board has frayed amid inconsistent results, and his preference for experienced defenders clashes with Spurs’ need to monetise young talent. The timing of the deal—amid reports of Inter Milan eyeing Djed Spence—further underscores Spurs’ defensive uncertainty. Spence, another World Cup performer, is now a target for multiple clubs, a reminder that Spurs’ transfer policy lacks clarity. Conte’s future is increasingly tied to whether he can coax value from a squad that feels both overpaid and underperforming.

Vuskovic’s move is a microcosm of Spurs’ summer: sell high on a player who never played, while failing to address the deeper issues that keep them adrift in the title race. Brighton, meanwhile, have taken a calculated risk on a defender whose best days may still lie ahead. Whether either club benefits will depend on factors far beyond the transfer fee.